Re:Only 17% of consumers believe personalized ads are ethica...
by otabdeveloper4 on Wednesday November 18, 2020 @07:58AM
(#25136227)
No. We don't live in an Isaac Asimov novel. Hari Seldon doesn't exists.
Advertisers want reproducible results backed by science and numbers. And the only way to get that today is with old-fashioned statistics - normal distrubutions, laws of large numbers and carefully controlled sample selection processes.
Nowhere here does the sci-fi of "mind control" factor.
What we're evolving is predators of human state of mind. For every well-understood target audience there is an optimal revenue extraction method. With more data new sub-audiences appear, allowing experiments to find even more effective advertising for maximizing revenue extraction in those subgroups.
A huge fraction of advertising is nothing more than gaslighting us into believing we have a need or desire for a product or service. The other fraction is exploiting biases in our brains to influence our purchasing decisions toward particular brands or markets.