Technically, it would be an undefined number of times easier. n/0 is not infinite.

Technically, we may consider k0s to be the limit of a decreasing sequence of container orchestrators

`k8s, k3s, ... = k{x}s as x -> 0`

in which case we have 8/x -> +inf

Technically, neither the limit or full progression is defined by the information available. The set {k8, k3, k0} may be equally represented as a decreasing series of container orchestrators with reducing prime differences.

I always thought that k3ks was so named because the symbol for 3 looks like a partial symbol for 8, indicating that it's k8s with a bit less.