News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:K0s – Zero Friction Kubernetes by bithavoc on Monday November 16, 2020 @06:11PM (#25118305)
The name seems to imply this project is 3x smaller than K3S[0], does it use less memory, CPU? If this is all about removing external dependencies, I don't think is worth creating an entire new project to avoid installing something like `socat`.

[0]https://k3s.io/

Re:K0s – Zero Friction Kubernetes by phist_mcgee on Monday November 16, 2020 @06:36PM (#25118515)
Technically it is infinite times smaller than k3s or k8s :)
Re:K0s – Zero Friction Kubernetes by stonewareslord on Monday November 16, 2020 @11:02PM (#25120154)
Technically, it would be an undefined number of times easier. n/0 is not infinite.
Re:K0s – Zero Friction Kubernetes by pcjthug on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @04:49AM (#25121865)
Technically, we may consider k0s to be the limit of a decreasing sequence of container orchestrators

`k8s, k3s, ... = k{x}s as x -> 0`

in which case we have 8/x -> +inf

Re:K0s – Zero Friction Kubernetes by kimburgess on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @07:17AM (#25122865)
Technically, neither the limit or full progression is defined by the information available. The set {k8, k3, k0} may be equally represented as a decreasing series of container orchestrators with reducing prime differences.
Re:K0s – Zero Friction Kubernetes by oarsinsync on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @12:30PM (#25126594)
I always thought that k3ks was so named because the symbol for 3 looks like a partial symbol for 8, indicating that it's k8s with a bit less.
Re:K0s – Zero Friction Kubernetes by pas on Monday November 16, 2020 @06:42PM (#25118574)
k3s recently switched to embedded etcd, so if you want something very lightweight out of the box (yet with HA), try Canonical's microk8s it has dqlite support.
Re:K0s – Zero Friction Kubernetes by darren0 on Tuesday November 17, 2020 @01:28AM (#25120840)
k3s still defaults to sqlite. For HA dqlite was dropped in favor of embedded etcd in k3s 1.19.