Re:The True Size Of Countries: Mercator projection
by ghayes on Sunday November 15, 2020 @09:48PM
(#25107417)
Is there a truly rationale basis here (other than “magnetic north” which is equally arbitrary and has rotated)? I’d argue since the vast majority of the world’s population lives in the northern hemisphere, it generally makes sense to put that at the top, all else being equal.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The True Size Of Countries: Mercator projection
by xvedejas on Sunday November 15, 2020 @11:31PM
(#25108032)
On the contrary, it makes the most sense to place some point of the equator on top, so that you can rotate to look at any part of the globe you want, surely?
Re:The True Size Of Countries: Mercator projection
by slavik81 on Monday November 16, 2020 @01:19AM
(#25108678)
It's a lot easier to add the rest of the solar system if it rotates around the Earth horizontally, and you need that to explain the day/night cycle, seasons and tides.
Re:The True Size Of Countries: Mercator projection
by samatman on Monday November 16, 2020 @03:50AM
(#25109549)
Call me weird if you must, but I would prefer a globe rotate in the same fashion as the planet does: around the poles.
Re:The True Size Of Countries: Mercator projection
by mkl on Monday November 16, 2020 @05:24AM
(#25110134)
That's perfectly compatible with the poles being on the sides and the equator being on a vertical plane. In fact, many globes can be tilted to this position and the main rotation still happens around the poles.
Re:The True Size Of Countries: Mercator projection
by samatman on Monday November 16, 2020 @02:20PM
(#25115822)
Granted, but surely that would place "all points" on the equator "on top" rather than "some point"?
Re:The True Size Of Countries: Mercator projection
by xvedejas on Monday November 16, 2020 @07:41PM
(#25119043)
You're right, I spoke imprecisely. Some point on top to begin with, any other equatorial point you want with a quick spin.
Re:The True Size Of Countries: Mercator projection
by thaumasiotes on Monday November 16, 2020 @08:56AM
(#25111620)
They all do, but you can have more than one dimension of rotation.
Look at https://www.amazon.com/dp/B085K2ZPWB/ .
You're still free to spin the earth backwards, though.
Re:The True Size Of Countries: Mercator projection
by iso1631 on Monday November 16, 2020 @11:15AM
(#25113388)
Interesting, so a globe on a 90 degree axial tilt rather than a 23 degree one. I'm sure I've seen such (either fixed at 90 degees or variable from 0-90 degrees), but I can't see any after a quick browser online.
Re:The True Size Of Countries: Mercator projection
by 4gotunameagain on Monday November 16, 2020 @06:13AM
(#25110394)
But if the majority of the population lives in the northern hemisphere, shouldn't that make it heavier and thus flip the earth, placing the south pole on the top?
Re:The True Size Of Countries: Mercator projection
by paul_f on Monday November 16, 2020 @05:38AM
(#25110216)
For one, the southern hemisphere is mostly water.
Re:The True Size Of Countries: Mercator projection
by yesbabyyes on Monday November 16, 2020 @10:39AM
(#25112974)
I think there is, actually: The Milky Way Galaxy. South is "down" towards the center, North is "up" towards the exterior. It was a revelation to realize this after growing up looking at the Milky Way in Northern Europe, that we're somewhat stationary in relation to the galaxy.
Re:The True Size Of Countries: Mercator projection
by andi999 on Monday November 16, 2020 @11:19AM
(#25113448)
Can you explain this more? I do not understand this
Re:The True Size Of Countries: Mercator projection
by RichardCA on Monday November 16, 2020 @02:17PM
(#25115781)
The galactic center roughly aligns with the constellation Sagittarius, which is considered a southern constellation.
If you try to do milky way astrophotography in the northern hemisphere you quickly find out you are limited to the late spring / early summer, because you want to be seeing the southern sky at night. Most of the year the sun is too close to Sagittarius during daylight hours, making viewing impossible.