News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Save like a pessimist, invest like an optimist by imtringued on Saturday November 14, 2020 @02:07PM (#25094709)
You have $100k. Put 80% of it in the stock market. The stock market drops by 40%, your investment is worth $48k and you withdraw nothing but spend your entire emergency fund. The market recovers and now your portfolio is worth $80k.

You have $100k. Put all of it in the stock market. The stock market drops by 40%, your investment is worth $60k and you withdraw $20k. The market goes back to 100% and now you have $67k in your portfolio.

If the market dropped by 80% your portfolio would be gone entirely. Meanwhile if you had enough emergency funds you would have kept everything.

The worse the emergency, the higher the ROI of the emergency fund. Since there is no upper bound for how bad an emergency can be the theoretical ROI of an emergency fund is also unbounded.

In this comment the definition of an emergency is a stock market drop combined with unexpected unemployment.

Re:Save like a pessimist, invest like an optimist by Moodles on Saturday November 14, 2020 @04:50PM (#25095963)
You've just given a cherry picked example to show that yes, withdrawing during market downturns is bad. I don't disagree with this? I'm merely saying that, on average, over the long-term, it makes more mathematical sense to ditch the EF if you're a high net worth individual. For example, you have literally just picked the worst case scenario and used that to justify why the strategy is bad. What about all the times your emergency doesn't coincide with a total market crash? My all stock "emergency fund" will actually grow larger than yours, on average. You probably have several emergencies over the course of your life.

Honestly your example is about as useful as me saying investing in stocks in general is bad, because sometimes, they go down. So what? We're talking about broad long-term averages here, nothing more.

It's fine to argue about personal psychological preferences, but as I say, this purely a mathematical statement I am making here. It should not be controversial, but it always is.

Re:Save like a pessimist, invest like an optimist by paulpauper on Saturday November 14, 2020 @05:02PM (#25096053)
in theory, all your money should be in the market if the market is efficient and has a positive drift
Re:Save like a pessimist, invest like an optimist by Moodles on Saturday November 14, 2020 @05:06PM (#25096087)
Yeah, I mean there's also some practicalities involved like having cash to withdraw from an ATM or paying rent, but yeah pretty much I'm fully invested.
Re:Save like a pessimist, invest like an optimist by hanoz on Saturday November 14, 2020 @02:53PM (#25095080)
That's all for an emergency on day one! If the stock market goes up 70% before your emergency, you'd have been better off with the all in strategy.
Re:Save like a pessimist, invest like an optimist by Moodles on Saturday November 14, 2020 @05:00PM (#25096032)
I know. I get the exact same push back every time I mention this. I don't know why? I'm literally saying, on average, over the long-term, it's mathematically better to ditch the EF. This is a mathematical statement, but always someone says ""but what about 2008!?" as if I havn't considered it. It's quite bizarre. I suppose an EF is an emotional issue for a lot of people maybe.
Re:Save like a pessimist, invest like an optimist by sokoloff on Saturday November 14, 2020 @02:32PM (#25094925)
That’s another use of margin. Invest 100% (but not more). Emergency hits and you can withdraw cash without selling stocks (up to a point).
Re:Save like a pessimist, invest like an optimist by Moodles on Saturday November 14, 2020 @05:04PM (#25096065)
I mean honestly, using a credit card for a month before interest hits is usually fine too? My credit limit is like 50k or something ridiculous across all my cards. Not to mention when all in on stocks you can sell for better long-term capital gains tax treatment or even tax loss harvest losses too, which you can't do with a savings account. And ETFs are actually pretty liquid: I can sell and withdraw in a few days if I wanted to anyway.
Re:Save like a pessimist, invest like an optimist by sokoloff on Saturday November 14, 2020 @05:19PM (#25096209)
Yes, but then you need cash to pay off the credit card, which is cheaper to pull from your margin available than to let the credit card charge you interest.
Re:Save like a pessimist, invest like an optimist by Moodles on Saturday November 14, 2020 @06:47PM (#25096741)
I'm not suggesting to pay credit card interest. I'm saying you can cover any emergency expense with a credit card which buys you a month, and then you might have ordinary salary or time to sell your stocks before interest is due.

No offense but I'm pretty surprised you commented what you did. Literally my first sentence says "... before interest hits...".

Re:Save like a pessimist, invest like an optimist by sokoloff on Saturday November 14, 2020 @07:05PM (#25096839)
I’m perhaps equally surprised that you’d consider anything an emergency that would covered by your ordinary salary within a month’s time. I mean, that’s just normal credit card use, right?
Re:Save like a pessimist, invest like an optimist by Moodles on Saturday November 14, 2020 @09:35PM (#25097719)
Maybe we’re talking cross purposes here because I generally save a large % of my paycheck. So if an emergency came up (and I was still employed) I would just save a smaller % of it.

But regardless I’m just saying you can use a credit card to buy time interest-free before you pay off the emergency with your salary/stocks/whatever. It’s better than taking a margin loan, no?

Re:Save like a pessimist, invest like an optimist by chii on Sunday November 15, 2020 @12:54AM (#25098655)
> So if an emergency came up (and I was still employed) I would just save a smaller % of it.

i mean that's not really an emergency.

An emergency is one such that if you weren't prepared for it, you can't handle it. For example, losing one's job can be considered an emergency (a short one, if you're in high demand).

A medical emergency is a good example of an emergency - to which you prepare for by purchasing insurance.

So by saying that a person's portfolio would perform better by ditching the emergency fund is just the same as saying 'take on more risk and get more return'.

Re:Save like a pessimist, invest like an optimist by Moodles on Sunday November 15, 2020 @10:15AM (#25101793)
You’re kind of nitpicking here. It doesn’t matter how much the expense is: the point is that you can use a credit card to buy time interest-free before you pay off the expense with stock/paychecks/whatever. Regardless of what the expense is, this is clearly better than taking out a margin loan immediately.