News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel's disruption is now complete by mytailorisrich on Saturday November 14, 2020 @12:49PM (#25093993)
Phone chips are hard not least, or especially, the telecom part. I'm thinking that some companies underestimate the effort.

Broadcom also tried and also failed. They came in cocky because they had succeeded in making Wifi chips with a 10-20 people team so thought that 500-ish people was more than enough for cellular even if Qualcomm had 4x that...

I would not be surprised if Intel fell into the same trap.

Re:Intel's disruption is now complete by ajb on Saturday November 14, 2020 @04:47PM (#25095932)
At one point there were around 14 companies going for the mobile chip market. So it was clear there was going to be a massive casualty rate.
Re:Intel's disruption is now complete by evancox100 on Saturday November 14, 2020 @12:58PM (#25094077)
TI was also in the mobile AP space for a while then dropped out
Re:Intel's disruption is now complete by m4rtink on Sunday November 15, 2020 @11:26AM (#25102340)
From what I've heard their mobile SoCs were pretty high quality & had superb documentation, running such famous (relatively) open Linux devices such as the legendary Nokia N900. TI dropping out of the mobile game also had a profound effect on the full Maemo/MeeGo saga later on.

I guess even Sailfish OS that came after MeeGo is not really immune to SoC supplier dropping out under it as the first Jolla smartphone with Sailfish OS should have run on a SoC from Sony Ericsson only for SE dropping out of the game as well! And the (in?) famous Jolla Tablet had one of those Intel Atom x86 mobile processor.