News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SLS vs. Starship by wongarsu on Friday November 13, 2020 @12:31PM (#25084879)
Multi-launch was considered for the Apollo program, but was ruled out because it had higher technical risk than just scaling up the rocket and making the payload extra light. If we didn't have the hard 1969 deadline we would likely have gone with the multi-launch option back then.

It's an interesting alternate reality to imagine: we might have had a more interesting moon program that had the ability to naturally scale to larger and larger missions, instead of repeating basically the same thing until the public gets bored and cancels it.

Re:SLS vs. Starship by Gravityloss on Friday November 13, 2020 @01:09PM (#25085414)
Yeah, first orbital docking was done 1966 on Gemini 8. The architecture for Apollo was decided much earlier already (it did include the lunar orbit rendezvous and docking which was indeed risky).

We now have 54 years of repeated low earth orbit dockings so maybe the architecture designs could start taking that into account.

Even SpaceX is planning on doing orbital refueling.

Re:SLS vs. Starship by garaetjjte on Friday November 13, 2020 @02:44PM (#25086525)
There were plans for more interesting moon missions under Apollo Applications Program, cancelled because of budget cuts. (and what was left was botched as Skylab)