News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Disaster prepping is mainstream again by jonahx on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @12:53PM (#25060782)
> should I actually invest any effort into large-scale problems that occur at scales longer than my life when there are risks that are far higher around which I can make direct changes?

Yes.

The relevant number is not p, the likelihood of the event.

It is something like:

EV = p * consequences

If the consequences are high enough (eg, death), then it is still rational to prepare for low probability events. Especially when the prep cost is low.

Re:Disaster prepping is mainstream again by dekhn on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @02:12PM (#25061739)
... and what we've established is that not a lot of people die in big earthquakes, but there's a lot of economic impact. I think people overweight the consequences because earthquakes are big and exciting.
Re:Disaster prepping is mainstream again by jonahx on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @04:41PM (#25063365)
I suppose that's fair. But I think it's less the "big and exciting" part and more the "imagining myself trapped and dying of thirst" or some such that motivates the "consequences" part of the equation.