News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by yonisto on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @08:13AM (#25058056)
We also need a name for those who wish to ruin everything good with taxation.
Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by dwaltrip on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @11:06AM (#25059465)
Examples of large, modern societies flourishing without the use of taxation?
Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by donw on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @08:15PM (#25065194)
Singapore and Switzerland both have very low tax rates (topping out around ~ 20%), and both are great places to live. Panama is nice as well, and they top out at 25%.
Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by raxxorrax on Thursday November 12, 2020 @06:48AM (#25068805)
We don't tax the richest companies because there is a race to the bottom. It is the success story of Dublin for example.
Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by barumi on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @07:17PM (#25064669)
> Examples of large, modern societies flourishing without the use of taxation?

This is a disingenuous red herring.

It's one thing to claim that some amount of taxes to finance public spending can be benefitial to society.

It's an entirely different thing to claim that taxing remote work brings any benefit to society.

Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by dwaltrip on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @07:36PM (#25064838)
I was responding to a comment about “ruining everything good with taxation”.
Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by barumi on Thursday November 12, 2020 @03:08AM (#25067609)
Sounds to me like taxing WFH fits the description of "ruining everything good with taxation".

I mean, there's already a progressive income tax. Why should society create incentives to commute to work?

Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by dwaltrip on Thursday November 12, 2020 @11:01AM (#25071218)
I wasn’t commenting on a tax on WFH. I haven’t thought about it much, but I’m likely in agreement with you on that issue.
Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by ulucs on Thursday November 12, 2020 @02:54AM (#25067529)
You can collect taxes without ruining everything
Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by tanseydavid on Thursday November 12, 2020 @01:01PM (#25072629)
> You can collect taxes without ruining everything

True -- which explains why the following rhetorical question is indeed a RED HERRING.

> Examples of large, modern societies flourishing without the use of taxation?

No one has suggested zero taxation anywhere in the thread that I can find...

Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by emteycz on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @03:09PM (#25062407)
Examples of large, modern societies that gave way for new ideas instead of preserving the status quo at all costs?
Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by dwaltrip on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @07:38PM (#25064857)
Nothing “gives way”, yet things change now and then regardless.

It shouldn’t be taken for granted, of course. And we should aspire to make it easier for good new ideas to take hold.

Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by op00to on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @08:16AM (#25058073)
Quisling
Re:Tax working from home 'to support vulnerable jobs' – Deut... by lwhalen on Wednesday November 11, 2020 @09:41AM (#25058764)
Democrat