News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Could a Peasant Defeat a Knight in Battle? by jml7c5 on Tuesday November 10, 2020 @12:03AM (#25042956)
Do you have more detail on this? Is there supporting detail from other sources? It's not clear from my brief reading that the association was conclusively for self-defense and held no insurrectionary or political aspect.
Re:Could a Peasant Defeat a Knight in Battle? by Leherenn on Tuesday November 10, 2020 @02:41AM (#25043627)
It might have started for self-defence, but became insurrectionist once the vikings had been defeated. "Why should we pay fealty to a liege that fails at his most basic duty?"

The terms used are "conjurés/conjuration" (from Google: Middle English (also in the sense ‘oblige by oath’): from Old French conjurer ‘to plot or exorcise’, from Latin conjurare ‘band together by an oath, conspire’ (in medieval Latin ‘invoke’), from con- ‘together’ + jurare ‘swear’.). It seems to imply something more than just gather together for self-defence.