Re:Pixel 5 review: Google spends its bill-of-materials budge...
by modeless on Monday November 09, 2020 @04:16PM
(#25040016)
I realize this opinion is very popular but I had the opposite experience. Fingerprint often took multiple tries or outright failed, while face unlock on Pixel 4 XL has been more reliable and plenty fast. Masks are really the only issue and personally I don't need them that often.
Re:Pixel 5 review: Google spends its bill-of-materials budge...
by meowster on Monday November 09, 2020 @04:19PM
(#25040055)
It sounds like the Pixel 5 fingerprint scanner might be hit-or-miss. A few people have reported it not reading fingerprints very well, and even for me, occasionally it doesn't work well (but most of the time it does).
Re:Pixel 5 review: Google spends its bill-of-materials budge...
by wffurr on Monday November 09, 2020 @04:11PM
(#25039954)
The 4a also has the fingerprint sensor. I think it was a big mistake to not include it on the Pixel 4, but that whole device was gimmicky and weird.
Kind of the like the Pixel 5. Gimmicky and weird, but at least they put the fingerprint sensor back on it.
Re:Pixel 5 review: Google spends its bill-of-materials budge...
by Tehhund on Saturday November 14, 2020 @07:24PM
(#25096943)
I traded in my Pixel 4 XL for a 5, and despite the 5's weaknesses that are laid out in the article I'm very happy with the switch. I'm running all the same apps but everything feels smoother. I'm not sure why but I'm not questioning it. And the huge battery is awesome.
Im excited that the Pixel 5 reintroduced the fingerprint scanner. I am strongly considering tossing my new Pixel 4 and upgrading it to the 5.