Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by remram on Saturday November 07, 2020 @04:26PM
(#25019583)
States are not people, why should states have a voice? What voice would that be, if not the one of the people who live there?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by throwaway201103 on Saturday November 07, 2020 @04:37PM
(#25019727)
Because the constitution says the states elect the president. That's how it works. In modern times this means the people of each state decide, by popular vote, how their state votes.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by remram on Saturday November 07, 2020 @08:28PM
(#25021877)
You're saying it should be like this because it is like this. That doesn't take us very far.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by beaner on Saturday November 07, 2020 @04:28PM
(#25019615)
States having a voice is the whole point of a state. If states shouldn't have a voice, they should be phased out.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by rootusrootus on Saturday November 07, 2020 @05:41PM
(#25020341)
But they do have a voice, they are an entire level of gov't. They shouldn't necessarily have any particular say in the election of the president.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by remram on Saturday November 07, 2020 @08:32PM
(#25021906)
States "have a voice" in the local justice system and laws, as well as senators.
Making the president of the whole country be elected directly by the whole country would not make states redundant, far from it.