News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's tweets since polls closed. Parent comment

[dead]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by altdatathrow on Saturday November 07, 2020 @12:32PM (#25016590)
Every intelligence agency in the US and numerous foreign intelligence agencies substantiated those claims.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by Izkata on Saturday November 07, 2020 @12:58PM (#25016864)
Different claim. Interference is not aid.

Aid was disproven, interference was proven.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by pjc50 on Saturday November 07, 2020 @12:59PM (#25016874)
Could you elaborate on what the difference is supposed to be?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by legolas2412 on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:02PM (#25016913)
Russian interfered via hacking emails, leaking them, polarizing voters by advertisement (only worth 100k$ though), and maybe even leaking a fake steele dossier.

But no american has been even indicted of collusion with russia, from what I understand. So trump campaign did not work with russia, even if russia put in efforts that helped trump

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by happytoexplain on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:38PM (#25017280)
It's important to remember that "unproven" and even "disproven" are not equivalent to "unsubstantiated". Otherwise, it would be impossible to make any reasonable criticism of anybody for anything. The Russia question was a criticism that came from something. Trump's various claims come from nothing.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by im3w1l on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:47PM (#25017402)
I've seen some claims of voting irregularities that I find credible. But think more local guy decides on his own to do small scale cheating, rather than an organized campaign. And I suspect it's not big enough to matter. For Trump to declare himself winner is certainly reckless.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by gamblor956 on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:32PM (#25017199)
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/what-mueller-...

The Mueller Report documents that Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump meant with Russians multiple times to coordinate political activities during the 2016 campaign.

They weren't indicted because AG Barr, Donald Trump's personal appointee, has refused to indict them.

It is very possible that they could be indicted within the next year.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by threatofrain on Saturday November 07, 2020 @02:48PM (#25018358)
One administration prosecuting another would be unprecedented and probably embittering, regardless of its value to truth and justice.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by gamblor956 on Saturday November 07, 2020 @04:10PM (#25019421)
It would not be one administration prosecuting another, it would be non-partisan prosecutors prosecuting criminals.

Donald Trump attempted to politicize the DOJ, but otherwise it is a non-political entity and has prosecuted Republicans and Democrats alike during previous administrations.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by threatofrain on Saturday November 07, 2020 @08:53PM (#25022037)
What Donald Trump demonstrated was that the DOJ and judiciary are structurally partisan even if they were culturally neutral.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by omgwtfbyobbq on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:32PM (#25017195)
Russia's interference in the election still aided Trump's campaign, even if the DOJ was unable to conclusively prove there was any collusion to obtain that aid.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by bsg75 on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:01PM (#25016894)
No, because those concerns were based on investigations.

Trup is simply throwing a tantrum online because he can’t behave like an adult in the face of defeat.

Also based on evidence he knows he is potentially inciting violence, because any concerns are to be addressed in the courts, not on social media.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by libraryatnight on Saturday November 07, 2020 @12:41PM (#25016682)
they were substantiated though. it's a fact at this point.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by NicoJuicy on Saturday November 07, 2020 @12:47PM (#25016750)
https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/cyber/russian-interference-in-201...
[ Parent | on HN ]
[dead]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by libraryatnight on Saturday November 07, 2020 @12:47PM (#25016747)
That evidence is not evidence. Do you think this is facebook and I'm your computer illiterate aunt?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by pjc50 on Saturday November 07, 2020 @12:43PM (#25016710)
Every time this gets near a court it gets thrown due to lack of evidence.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by NicoJuicy on Saturday November 07, 2020 @12:50PM (#25016783)
Debunked... https://mobile.twitter.com/gelbach/status/132476099369259008...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by mynameishere on Saturday November 07, 2020 @12:39PM (#25016660)
It's enemy territory now, bud.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by hnuser847 on Saturday November 07, 2020 @12:47PM (#25016752)
I’m not on either side. I’m just calling out partisans for their obvious hypocrisy.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by _dibly on Saturday November 07, 2020 @12:57PM (#25016851)
Calling out partisans for hypocrisy is commendable, using a weak false equivalence to do it when there isn't any basis for it makes you look mad.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Twitter has applied warning labels to 37% of Trump's twee... by happytoexplain on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:43PM (#25017347)
I don't think this is hypocrisy - one of the two examples is more justified, realistically speaking, than the other.
[ Parent | on HN ]