Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by CurtHagenlocher on Saturday November 07, 2020 @11:31AM
(#25016018)
Everybody does realize that this has no legal significance, right?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by notatoad on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:33PM
(#25017215)
Yes, I'm pretty sure everybody here understands that AP doesn't officially decide who wins the election.
It still has significance.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by iconjack on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:49PM
(#25017426)
Joe Biden has added "president elect" to his bio. When Trump tweets that he won, Twitter flags it.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by amf12 on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:55PM
(#25017505)
The difference being Joe did not call himself that. He waited for AP to call it.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by iconjack on Saturday November 07, 2020 @06:59PM
(#25021141)
That's my point. AP doesn't decide who won the election.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by User23 on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:28PM
(#25017158)
Surely somewhere in the emanations and penumbras of the constitution we can find that the AP’s decision is binding.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by dentemple on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:37PM
(#25017264)
As Hamilton famously wrote in Federalist Paper #85:
"It's not official until it's Facebook Official."
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by adamch on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:28PM
(#25017152)
It's predictive of a forthcoming legally-significant event.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by handmodel on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:39PM
(#25017293)
Do you realize no one thinks it has legal significance?
But it is a marker that people use as shorthand. There is no getting around the fact that Biden will have 270 electoral votes.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by dllthomas on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:55PM
(#25017500)
There absolutely is room for Biden not to have 270 electoral votes, if investigations reveal (... correctly or incorrectly) big enough issues that some states don't send electors.
I don't think there's a realistic way for Trump to have 270 electoral votes, but he could still possibly be awarded the Presidency by a weird-ass one-vote-per-state vote in the House.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by googthrowaway42 on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:47PM
(#25017390)
> Do you realize no one thinks it has legal significance?
Almost everyone does.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by nooyurrsdey on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:33PM
(#25017218)
what an obnoxious way to rain on a parade. everyone is more than aware of how the electoral system works.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by GavinMcG on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:44PM
(#25017356)
Looking around the thread you'll see that might not be the case. I think the comment meant to correct a (hopefully uncommon) misconception that the election is now final before all the votes have been counted, which of course isn't true.
Re:Biden wins White House, vowing new direction for divided ...
by A4ET8a8uTh0 on Saturday November 07, 2020 @01:39PM
(#25017285)
Yes, but note how quickly it was picked up by general populace as fait accompli.