Re:A nameless hiker and the case the internet can’t crack
by dreamcompiler on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @03:06PM
(#24983422)
All of this would show up in an autopsy. Snake bites would leave visible puncture wounds. There are for all practical purposes no deadly spiders native to the US. Tissue necrosis from a brown recluse would be visible, and a black widow would leave neurotoxic signs that a decent autopsy would have found, as well as possibly the toxin itself. (Hardly anybody dies from those two spider bites, and those two are the only medically significant spiders in the US.)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A nameless hiker and the case the internet can’t crack
by Jtsummers on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @03:13PM
(#24983479)
How long would they remain detectable by an autopsy in a county that didn't even want to spend $5k on DNA testing? How long was the body decaying before discovered. I do agree about the necrotizing venoms. But consider a black widow. You could be incapacitated, rendered helpless for a day or so, and become sufficiently dehydrated to be essentially delirious after recovering from the bite proper. That would leave you in a state that, without assistance, you'd not die from the bite, but from starvation/dehydration several days later. How long is the toxin in the body?
Re:A nameless hiker and the case the internet can’t crack
by notacoward on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @03:27PM
(#24983607)
> All of this would show up in an autopsy
Not necessarily. The toxin could have been ingested, especially if it was something man-made rather than natural. Many would have left recognizable signs, but others you'd have to know what signs to look for and/or do a specific test. Whatever it is might even have cleared his system (it takes a while to become that emaciated) but not before doing some kind of neurological/motor damage.
Re:A nameless hiker and the case the internet can’t crack
by giantg2 on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @03:22PM
(#24983563)
Depends on the state of decomposition as to what they would find in the autopsy, but I would generally agree that invenomation is unlikely as it wouldn't explain the emaciation (they could be coincidental). Found in a tent in FL... I don't want to imagine that smell. It's also possible they found anomalies or issues but were not able to tie them to the death (I imagine the autopsy is confidential).