News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Voyager 2 is back online after eight months of radio silence by m4rtink on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @05:06AM (#24978148)
Well, you don't necessarily need to launch from Earth - starting an Orion mission from say high lunar orbit should be perfectly safe.
Re:Voyager 2 is back online after eight months of radio silence by jacobwilliamroy on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @05:32AM (#24978284)
Maybe. Personally, I would want to see A LOT of math and paperwork first before I listen to anyone who uses "perfectly safe" and "nuclear explosion" in the same sentence. I'm still hoping we can figure out some other form of space travel which doesn't involve really, really, really big explosions.
Re:Voyager 2 is back online after eight months of radio silence by m4rtink on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @07:25AM (#24978981)
Nuclear Salt Water Rocket rides on one smaller continual nuclear explosion: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_salt-water_rocket
Re:Voyager 2 is back online after eight months of radio silence by prox on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @05:23AM (#24978233)
I think for Nuclear Propulsion we do need to start building in Space or on the Lunar Surface.

Another interesting idea is to propel micro crafts with lasers. I think there was an article on HN about that.

Re:Voyager 2 is back online after eight months of radio silence by mkl on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @06:00AM (#24978450)
Micro craft with light sails propelled by lasers have been discussed quite a bit. My favourite instance of it is in Charlie Stross's novel Accelerando.
Re:Voyager 2 is back online after eight months of radio silence by Hnrobert42 on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @08:54AM (#24979649)
At risk of contaminating future lunar bases.
Re:Voyager 2 is back online after eight months of radio silence by secondcoming on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @09:04AM (#24979716)
I'm pretty sure the moon is already being bombarded with all sorts of nasty radiation.
Re:Voyager 2 is back online after eight months of radio silence by Hnrobert42 on Tuesday November 03, 2020 @09:34AM (#24979955)
Ha. Excellent point.

I would guess that radioactive particles on the surface would be different that radioactive bombardment from space. You could shield your shelter from space, but if the soil had radioactive particles in it, then you couldn’t bring it in your shelter. For that matter, you would also have to shield the floor, or at least remove a layer of soil. You might have to do that anyway to build a foundation.

If it isn’t obvious, I don’t know what I am talking about.