News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Case Against More Ethanol (2016) by hedora on Monday November 02, 2020 @01:36PM (#24971424)
A $1 per gallon tax on gasoline is enough to make it carbon negative:

1 gallon burnt emits 20lbs of CO2, and a ton is 2000 lbs, so 100 gallons of gasoline emits a ton of CO2.

With current technology takes $15-75 to pull a ton of CO2 out of the atmosphere, or $0.15-0.75 to remediate a gallon of gasoline.

I argue a $1/gallon tax is the minimum viable, since we’ll need a carbon negative economy for the foreseeable future.

It’s not clear to me that $1 more per gallon of gas would kill ICE cars. If I ran a big auto maker, I’d actually lobby for such a tax, since it’s easier than retooling all the lines, and it pushes the cleanup costs onto legacy customers.

I personally think the tax should be paid upfront when you buy a new ICE car (assume it’ll last 100,000-200,000 miles), and not at the pump.

Re:The Case Against More Ethanol (2016) by belorn on Monday November 02, 2020 @03:08PM (#24972598)
Here in Sweden we pay about $4.5 per gallon in taxes.

ICE is still the norm in Sweden, with EC standing for 3% of all personal cars. EC have however taken a significant chunk of new sales, with last month being 35%. It also help that all government workplaces over a certain size has free EC charging, and even some shopping centers.