- like i said, it IS an ad hominem

- i didn't say i disagree. in fact i find no argument (except from the fairytale part that really isnt worth discussing) (PS @ameetgaitonde sums it up pretty nicely, really nothing more to say)

- The supposed recap of recent history, full with affectionate dimunitives like maggie. It's just bad writing

- Again, everything. I ve read a lot. Can you point one article that has an actual point? His articles are the GPT-3 of economics.

And i mean, its not just me, none of the comments here are about the text. Perhaps because theres nothing to talk about there.

I think incangold was implying you were spouting ad hominem.

I want to say this about the GPT-3 of economics, but I forgot! Glad I am not the only one!