In a low luminosity environment, you will get better contrast with less emission if you have most of your screen dark and slightly more backlight than with most of it lit and less backlight. You will want to adjust the light anyway, but the dark mode is theoretically a gain.
But all of that is moot anyway, because the web doesn't work in dark mode. So if you try to go with it you will keep being exposed to high brightness at random, what is much worse than any alternative.
On (S/AM)OLED screens the black colour (true dark) is simply zero light.
If you think it blocks enough backlight you’re deluding yourself. Display a pure black image (with a small white square in the middle to defeat dynamic contrast) and turn off the screen. From TVs to laptops, as long as it’s LCD the difference is obvious.
On my phone it's a different story, since it's OLED. Especially in lower light reducing brightness has little impact on contrast and vibrance.
Can't wait for OLED or microLED to become the standard in desktop and laptop displays so we no longer have to deal with the drawbacks of backlights.
These are superior in color, brightness and smoothness much like CRT, without most drawbacks.
(Not that it is designed for blue light blocking per se).
Though, again, the point is more that even with dark mode, turn down the brightness. (I think. Not original poster.)
It does. I'm using a dark theme for HN with a background of #222 and text of #CCC on my Dell U2412M display with the brightness at 100%. I measured with the ambient light sensor in my old Nexus 5 held up to my head. While lux values from smartphones are uncalibrated, it's the ratios that matter.
Dark theme, backlight 100%: 1 lux
Light theme, backlight 100%: 54 lux
Light theme, backlight 0% (not actually off): 7 lux
And my hypothesis was more that the bright parts are still bright. It is obviously less overall, but the small things are still hitting your eyes. Potentially worse, as your eyes aren't dilated correctly for the brightness.
Dark 100%: 5 lux
Light 100%: 103 lux
Dark 0%: 0 lux
Light 0%: 14 lux
0% PQ: 0.12 nit
0% SDR: 0.2 nit
100% SDR: ~120 nit
100% PQ: 570 nit
It works better in dark mode than your low contrast. The screen does not support local dimming.
This is completely false and the very raison d’être for developing OLED (plasma had this for TVs but the power consumption was ludicrous). See my sibling comment.
I can see how it is marginally false, say with a blue-themed dark mode.
Or maybe marginally false, with a cheap LED screen with a terrible contrast ratio.
Or completely not-false, with a non-blue-themed OLED dark mode.
Or mostly non-false possibly with local dimming.
but calling it completely false is completely psuedodoxical.
:)
What. No. Most of the harmful blue light comes from LCD backlight (of course it does not apply to OLED as much).
This kind of misunderstanding is why there have been so many dark mode or low contrast themes (like zenburn), which is a failure to recognise that what you have to turn down is screen brightness.
Like loudness wars for music it may be more pleasant to have nice brightness for a couple of seconds, but here’s my take: set brightness to a satisfactory value, then turn it down (a bit, maybe more). Your eyes will adapt. Over the course of a day facing a screen (which is basically a flashlight) it makes a massive difference. As a bonus when unplugged this saves crazy battery life.
> Since not everyone can see well with Dark Mode, some mobile devices provide the option for Blue Light filters
Huh. f.lux & al are not an alternative to dark mode, one should definitely use such settings, even with dark mode.
Final tip: pay attention to ambient and bias lightning.