Re:Glass viscosity calculations debunk the myth of flow in m...
by nemo44x on Thursday October 29, 2020 @11:11PM
(#24938748)
Did you go to public schools? I did. The student body is mainly uninterested, incapable, or irredeemable. Some great diamonds in the ruff to be sure. But certainly these people would excel regardless of a 1-off actual good teacher seeing as most of them are just mailing it in, like their student body.
Why go to the trouble of getting a masters to waste it like this?
FWIW I don’t believe teachers should need a bachelors. A 2-year trade school should suffice.
Re:Glass viscosity calculations debunk the myth of flow in m...
by therealdrag0 on Friday October 30, 2020 @12:40AM
(#24939229)
I went to public schools. The majority of teachers worked hard and did well with what they had. And many of them had masters.
Re:Glass viscosity calculations debunk the myth of flow in m...
by Digit-Al on Friday October 30, 2020 @03:52AM
(#24940030)
It's "diamonds in the rough" not "ruff". Sorry to assume you spoke English as a first language ;-)
Re:Glass viscosity calculations debunk the myth of flow in m...
by nemo44x on Friday October 30, 2020 @08:18AM
(#24941437)
Touché.
Re:Glass viscosity calculations debunk the myth of flow in m...
by chowned on Friday October 30, 2020 @12:11AM
(#24939071)
I sure am glad my fantastic public high school teachers didn't have your attitude. They sacrificed so much for so little, and I'll tell you what, they made a word of difference in at least one life: mine. From what I've learned of teachers, that's more than enough for them.
Shame.
Some people are teachers because they want to be teachers, period. They find fulfillment in it.
That’s not even touching the unnecessary dig at public institutions.