After he resigned!
Glenn Greenwald was able to post his article to substack in its unedited form and link it to his 1.5 million Twitter followers earlier today.
Way to weasel out of that question.
"Glenn was censored from publishing in his own publication!"
"No he wasn't he tweeted it later."
That's a non-answer.
What question?
Edit: >"Glenn was censored from publishing in his own publication!"
This is neither a question or a quote from what I said.
I'm not really interested in litigating who has the "correct" opinion or version of events, but I'm skeptical that the editors' stance of "If you'd like to publish this as is, we'd prefer that you use your other enormous and wide-reaching platform(s) rather than the one tied to our professional reputations" counts as true censorship. Millions of people read his story today.