Comey's letter wasn't a lie. The timing was bad but it accurately represented what the FBI was doing at the time.

I'm not saying the Comey letter was a lie; I'm saying media organizations made mistakes in how they covered it. If you prefer:

"A fact that's missing critical context can travel half way around the world while the full context is putting on its shoes."

The same fundamental concept is at play here.

It was against FBI policy to declare that so close to an election

Supposedly Comey violated it because some FBI agents were already illegally leaking it to Guliani and he was sure Clinton would win anyway

And then he was fired. :D

Biden could have addressed this story months ago. He knew about it. You'd think the democrats would have learned not to nominate a second clinton who refuses questions. They still think its easy to stomp on a story than address it.

He could/should have addressed this back in the primaries. They were running stories about it. He said nothing.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/08/02/joe-biden...

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/09/james-biden-health-...

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/08/will-hunter-bi...

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukr...

What do you mean he knew about it months ago? The point is that this is all just a fabrication, there is no story to address.

> Biden could have addressed this story months ago.

If the story is true. If it's a fabrication - as they allege, and given that Fox News passed on it (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-electio...) and the Post's reporter didn't want his byline on it (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/18/business/media/new-york-p...), seems reasonably likely - they didn't hear about it until last week.