News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Soylent isn’t Healthy (2017) by JohnGB on Thursday October 29, 2020 @01:55PM (#24933166)
That's not quite accurate. Soy contains phytoestrogen, which is a plant estrogen, not a human estrogen. It's similar in many ways and does have (in a much weaker form) some of the effects of human estrogen. However, just calling it "estrogen" implies that it's the same as human estrogen. It isn't.
Re:Soylent isn’t Healthy (2017) by 127 on Thursday October 29, 2020 @01:58PM (#24933203)
From anecdotal evidence it seems for some people the phytoestrogen still activates estrogen pathways. Probably has genetic variation on the effects.
Re:Soylent isn’t Healthy (2017) by AlexandrB on Thursday October 29, 2020 @02:01PM (#24933229)
Anecdotal evidence? How does someone anecdotally detect that their estrogen pathway has been activated?
Re:Soylent isn’t Healthy (2017) by 127 on Thursday October 29, 2020 @02:10PM (#24933384)
By growing big moobs.
Re:Soylent isn’t Healthy (2017) by evanextreme on Thursday October 29, 2020 @02:17PM (#24933499)
then why is that not the case for countries with a significantly higher proportion of soy in their diets such as countries in Asia? if what you said is true then once would expect to notice it
Re:Soylent isn’t Healthy (2017) by 127 on Thursday October 29, 2020 @05:52PM (#24936510)
Like I said, genetic variation.
Re:Soylent isn’t Healthy (2017) by evanextreme on Thursday October 29, 2020 @08:00PM (#24937590)
so you suspect that some gene (evidence for which also exists "anecdotally") triggers a genetic response only in countries where this type of food isn't regularly consumed? because then this sounds like a wild guess prompted by suspicions and pseudoscience