News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter still hasn't unlocked the New York Post's account by roenxi on Monday October 26, 2020 @04:37PM (#24901081)
> As the saying goes, Zerohedge has predicted 28 of the last 4 recessions.

No question ZeroHedge is excessively pessimistic, but that saying is silly. The US has been having recessions almost like clockwork once every 10 years since 1950 [0].

Saying "a recession is incoming!" is pretty much trivially true. It is always very likely there will be a recession in the next 10 years.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recessions_in_the_Unit...

Re:Twitter still hasn't unlocked the New York Post's account by dragonwriter on Monday October 26, 2020 @05:31PM (#24901711)
> The US has been having recessions almost like clockwork once every 10 years since 1950

Your standards for "clockwork" regularity seem to be quite low. Your own source offered to support that claim shows almost double that frequency from 1950-1990, and a maximum interval of 10 years, 8 months over the whole period. So it is neither "like clockwork" over that period (the frequency has on average dropped over the period, but the intervals are highly variable from one to the next), and not averaging anything like 10 years.

Re:Twitter still hasn't unlocked the New York Post's account by roenxi on Monday October 26, 2020 @05:41PM (#24901809)
Gee, well that leaves me debunked. I guess recessions are quite common and ZeroHedge is ... much more reliable than I thought? A scary discovery.

If you are planning your investments around not having a recession about once a decade, I'm unconvinced it will end well for you.

Anyway, the point stands - regularly predicting recessions is a sensible approach, and saying ZeroHedge overpredicts is wrong. The normal financial press are reckless in assuming that recessions are not imminent. Looking 5+ years into the future to assess the present state is prudent.

Re:Twitter still hasn't unlocked the New York Post's account by dragonwriter on Monday October 26, 2020 @05:54PM (#24901942)
> regularly predicting recessions is a sensible approach,

No, its not, because recessions do not occur on a regular pattern. And even if they did, its still possible to predict them much more frequently than they do occur.

> and saying ZeroHedge overpredicts is wrong.

Just doing a quick search, ZeroHedge seems to have predicted a recession, counting only predictions with a one year or shorter forward window, literally every year since the end of the of the Great Recession. In many of those years, they made at least one prediction where the window was effectively negative, as they claimed that the US was already in a recession that just wasn't yet recognized.

So, yes, ZeroHedge significantly overpredicts recessions, as they have predicted not less than 11 of the last 1 recessions.

> The normal financial press are reckless in assuming that recessions are not imminent.

That's a non-sequitur, in any case.

> Looking 5+ years into the future to assess the present state is prudent.

Sure, but if ZeroHedge was consistently predicting a recession within 5 years, they'd still be overpredicting by quite a lot (not if this was 1950-1990, but it isn't), but they are much, much worse than that.

Re:Twitter still hasn't unlocked the New York Post's account by jjeaff on Monday October 26, 2020 @08:56PM (#24903425)
No, I don't think you will come out ahead in your investments by trying to predict recessions. Timing the market almost always ends badly in the long term. The best way to come out ahead is to plan based on very long term market trends which include the recessions and stick to your plan with the understanding that there will be recessions, you just don't know when they will start and when they will end.

I'm quite certain if someone simulated trading based on predicted recessions on ZH, you would end up well below market returns.