News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:‘Culture wars’ are fought by tiny minority – UK study by komali2 on Monday October 26, 2020 @10:26AM (#24896478)
Why didn't they use the term "privileged" then? I'm very happy to acknowledge my privilege, but I'd have to push back if someone was asking me to declare that I'm racist. I'm also happy to hear about times I was unintentionally so, but to lump me into the same boat as the people that were screaming in my face that I'm a race traitor for holding a black lives matter sign doesn't feel fair.
Re:‘Culture wars’ are fought by tiny minority – UK study by DarkWiiPlayer on Monday October 26, 2020 @11:04AM (#24896913)
> Why didn't they use the term "privileged" then?

Because that word lacks any form of punch. Being "privileged" does not imply any personal responsibility; it's essentially saying you got lucky.

My understanding is that this tactic of taking very strong words like "racist" or "nazi" and superextending their definitions is just an attempt to harness the strong emotional response people have to these words and direct it at a very large group of people.

The unfortunate side effect is, that it slowly weakens the terminology, to the point where some day being a "racist" might just not be a big deal anymore.

The more direct danger of this strategy is that, in the short term, while most of the population still associates a term with a different definition, it allows quickly invoking very strong emotions with an accusation that is not technically wrong by the newer definition.

This becomes even more obvious when you look at how people often dance around these definitions to deliberately keep the newer definition as esoteric as possible, so the word retains its connotations for as long as possible.

Re:‘Culture wars’ are fought by tiny minority – UK study by coldtea on Monday October 26, 2020 @10:37AM (#24896586)
>Why didn't they use the term "privileged" then?

They use that too, interchangegly and confusingly...