News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Vaccine hopes rise as Oxford jab prompts immune response ... by rimliu on Monday October 26, 2020 @08:07AM (#24895215)
How is immunity from infection questionable? We had 43 million cases and about a dozen or so reinfections. Not sure if confirmed reinfections reach the double digits yet.
Re:Vaccine hopes rise as Oxford jab prompts immune response ... by graeme on Monday October 26, 2020 @08:22AM (#24895337)
So studies of other coronaviruses show immunity lasted 6-12 months. We’re a but early to see mass reinfections.

That said, my guess would be normal reinfections would be less severe, more like a cold. There have been some severe reinfections but any reinfection under six months suggests something atypical in the immune response.

Also SARS-Cov-1 produced a longer immune response so that may happen here.

But lifelong sterilizing immunity seems pretty unlikely based on what we know so far. The vaccines aren’t aiming at sterilizing immunity actually, their goal is to greatly lower the severity of the infection.

Re:Vaccine hopes rise as Oxford jab prompts immune response ... by rimliu on Monday October 26, 2020 @08:51AM (#24895591)
Studies also show that the immunity for original SARS (the close relative) lasts many years.
Re:Vaccine hopes rise as Oxford jab prompts immune response ... by graeme on Monday October 26, 2020 @12:34PM (#24898004)
Yeah that’s what I meant by SARS-Cov-1. But I prob should have gone with the clearer term
Re:Vaccine hopes rise as Oxford jab prompts immune response ... by celticninja on Tuesday October 27, 2020 @08:55AM (#24906917)
Re:Vaccine hopes rise as Oxford jab prompts immune response ... by celticninja on Monday October 26, 2020 @08:31AM (#24895410)
Read the papers on it, antibody tests in people who have previously tested positive for covid have found little or no antibodies in tests taken 3 months after infection. So it appears as if there is a limited/short term immunity after initial infection. The vaccine appears to produce a much stronger immune response, such that antibodies can be identified in tests some time after the vaccination.

You can get limited immunity from the common cold after being infected but you are just as likely to catch it 12 months later anyway. With covid that means we are dealing with it annually, which our health services cannot keep up with.

Re:Vaccine hopes rise as Oxford jab prompts immune response ... by rimliu on Monday October 26, 2020 @08:48AM (#24895566)
There are more immune mechanizms beside antibodies (T-cells, B-cells). For the common cold there are different viruses, so you may get a cold caused by different ones.
Re:Vaccine hopes rise as Oxford jab prompts immune response ... by dtech on Monday October 26, 2020 @10:04AM (#24896258)
antibodies disapear quickly, but the B-memory cells that produce them are still in the body ready to be mobilized.

"Common cold" and "flu" is not 1 virus, but hundreds of different viruses which is why you get them repeatedly. You do build immunity though. It's why children always have a cold and adults a lot less common.

Re:Vaccine hopes rise as Oxford jab prompts immune response ... by celticninja on Tuesday October 27, 2020 @08:55AM (#24906919)