News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Electoral College Decision Tree by dragonwriter on Friday October 23, 2020 @04:08PM (#24873463)
> One motivation for Jim Crow laws was to keep the southern voting-sampled portion of the south white and segregationist (in spite of the true distribution of local sentiment), while simultaneously benefiting from the larger population in magnifying their representation in national politics.

In theory, there is a (somewhat dated, given other evolutions in voting rights) remedy for that in Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment, though it can be hacked aroundt by selective criminalization (though that, in theory, is limited by Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment).

Unfortunately, neither of these has been very well enforced, especially Section 2.

Re:Electoral College Decision Tree by gen220 on Friday October 23, 2020 @05:53PM (#24874664)
I totally agree. It comes down to the legal definition of "abridged", "denied", and "crimes".

Unfortunately, in the present political climate, any reasonable interpretation of these words that hurts the representation of states with regressive voting laws would be seen as an act of politics.

The nice thing about my proposed hack, is that it also incentivizes decriminalization, or at least allowing a broader class of humans in your state to vote. In this way, it doesn't matter if the 14th amendment is well-enforced, because it changes the goal posts.

So, while it might not give felons the vote (this would violate the 14th), it will encourage the dissolution of our current "justice" system that arbitrarily incarcerates people.

If your state incarcerates people for "driving while black", it is effectively diluting its representation in the congress and electoral college.

Re:Electoral College Decision Tree by throwaway0a5e on Friday October 23, 2020 @06:20PM (#24874914)
>Unfortunately, in the present political climate, any reasonable interpretation of these words that hurts the representation of states with regressive voting laws would be seen as an act of politics.

We've been misinterpreting words like "infringed" and "papers, and effects" for well over a century. The current climate while certainly non-helpful but I think there's a deeper root cause that keeps us from strongly enforcing the constitution.