Re:My platonic ideal for how engineering hiring should work
by jan_g on Wednesday October 21, 2020 @04:13AM
(#24845768)
That fear may be true for candidates without experience and/or university degree. But why is it still present for candidates with lots of experience and education? In other words, if other technical/engineering disciplines can manage without this absurd hiring process, then why can't IT field (leaving aside the candidates without experience/higher education)?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:My platonic ideal for how engineering hiring should work
by thu2111 on Wednesday October 21, 2020 @07:15AM
(#24846642)
Universities are terrible at teaching programming/software engineering. Many also suck at teaching computer science. There's no incentives in academia to be good at teaching, and many lecturers only care about their research.
There are arguments here and on the blog post that the industry doesn't have credentials. We do have credentials, it's the CS degree, but universities suck at issuing them so we don't rely on them much. Sometimes not at all.
The people saying, hey, why can't we be like civil engineering are thus perhaps not sounding as re-assuring as they hope: why would universities be more trustworthy at teaching civil engineering than other kinds of engineering? The problems are incentive related. Ultimately the software industry is highly egalitarian and a bad university experience can't hurt your career permanently, like it could in most other fields.
Re:My platonic ideal for how engineering hiring should work
by sk2020 on Wednesday October 21, 2020 @10:30AM
(#24848230)
When I say “engineer” in disciplines other than software, I mean somebody with a professional license. You can only get that by passing exams and having a combination of experience, education and recommendations to pass a state board. It’s much harder and riskier to fake that than to make up experience on a resume or make a blog to appear like a subject matter expert. Unless you know the candidate personally, it can take a lot of effort to uncover a carefully crafted lie. Plus, recognizing quality work in software isn’t even a solved problem, to my understanding.
Re:My platonic ideal for how engineering hiring should work
by learc83 on Wednesday October 21, 2020 @02:12PM
(#24850492)
Other engineering disciplines hire engineers who don’t have a PE all the time. There are more engineering disciplines where taking the PE exam is the minority than the other way around.
Re:My platonic ideal for how engineering hiring should work
by sk2020 on Thursday October 22, 2020 @07:47PM
(#24864594)
Of course they hire non-PEs. You can’t get a license without years (at least 4) of experience first. Most consultancies I know of would not hire anyone who couldn’t pass the FE, though.
Re:My platonic ideal for how engineering hiring should work
by learc83 on Friday October 23, 2020 @11:42AM
(#24870680)
My point is that there are plenty of electrical engineers, computer engineers etc... who never take the FE or PE exam.