Re:FCC to move ahead with 'rulemaking' on Section 230
by triceratops on Monday October 19, 2020 @03:03PM
(#24829692)
> Blocking content on a political basis as a non-internet content provider would be more than enough to get you treated as a publisher.
The key point here is "in pre-section 230 law". Prodigy Services was one the cases that prompted Congress to pass Section 230. Why cite outdated cases to try to prove your point? What's next, Dred Scott v. Sandford?
The key point here is "in pre-section 230 law". Prodigy Services was one the cases that prompted Congress to pass Section 230. Why cite outdated cases to try to prove your point? What's next, Dred Scott v. Sandford?