Re:First Bitcoin “mixer” penalized for violating anti-money ...
by pas on Monday October 19, 2020 @05:00PM
(#24830964)
Can't tax law cases eventually make it to the Supreme Court anyway?
Re:First Bitcoin “mixer” penalized for violating anti-money ...
by jskdvsksnb on Monday October 19, 2020 @05:44PM
(#24831371)
Anything can go to the supreme court if you try hard enough: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/mandamus
But also yes, the Supreme Court has discretionary appeals jurisdiction over any federal case.
Re:First Bitcoin “mixer” penalized for violating anti-money ...
by bottled_poe on Tuesday October 20, 2020 @01:29AM
(#24834182)
What do you think this is? Some kind of meritocracy?
I think the most commonsense reform is to have computer crime handled by specialized courts, much the same as tax law currently is. These domains are simply too complex to have them handled by legal generalists, who are expected to learn it all from first principles on each and every case.