Crowdsec: A Fail2Ban alternative written in Go

Re:Crowdsec: A Fail2Ban alternative written in Go by hda111 on Monday October 19, 2020 @12:32PM (#24827955)

Of course not. It's the same as with the Docker hype a few years ago. I don't get it. Still today everyone seems to think an app is better when it's "dockerized". Now with Go everyone can write buggy, memory leaking programs. I prefer apps written in C whenever a I can.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Crowdsec: A Fail2Ban alternative written in Go by the_only_law on Monday October 19, 2020 @12:48PM (#24828135)

Not sure why on earth you think something would be non-buggy or non-leaky just because its written in C. I avoid C for almost any user mode work save a few things.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Crowdsec: A Fail2Ban alternative written in Go by LambdaComplex on Monday October 19, 2020 @05:58PM (#24831502)

I'd expect the C to be buggier, personally

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Crowdsec: A Fail2Ban alternative written in Go by snazz on Monday October 19, 2020 @12:47PM (#24828127)

Garbage collection should make apps written in Go less memory-leaking and less buggy than those written in C, no?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Crowdsec: A Fail2Ban alternative written in Go by eeZah7Ux on Monday October 19, 2020 @12:46PM (#24828106)

we need a fork of HN

[ Parent | on HN ]