News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Charles Lindbergh is the reason the U.S. doesn't have cameras in the courtroom. Parent comment

Re:Charles Lindbergh is the reason the U.S. doesn't have cam... by minot on Saturday October 17, 2020 @06:55AM (#24809094)
Probably does not apply in all cases? Imagine someone beats me up or something but is found not guilty for some reason. Would I be charged with lying under oath or false accusations? It just increases the stakes for any lawsuit.

If I remember correctly, the previous district attorney in Manhattan was very friendly with the wealthy people. Imagine how much they could legally wreck your life if this was left up to the prosecution.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Charles Lindbergh is the reason the U.S. doesn't have cam... by koenigdavidmj on Saturday October 17, 2020 @07:58AM (#24809344)
Insufficient evidence to convict someone else is not sufficient evidence to convict you. They’d still have to convict a jury of your peers that you did so.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Charles Lindbergh is the reason the U.S. doesn't have cam... by Aeolun on Saturday October 17, 2020 @07:34AM (#24809238)
Applies in all cases, but it has to be deliberate. You can accuse as many people as you want if you actually (reasonably) believe they’ve done you wrong.
[ Parent | on HN ]