News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FCC to move ahead with 'rulemaking' on Section 230 by dragonwriter on Friday October 16, 2020 @12:06PM (#24802170)
> Firstly Microsoft monopoly got thrown out because of unethical behavior of the judge

No, it didn't.

The remedy (not the finding of monopoly and abuse of that monopoly) got sent back by a higher court for new proceedings, and then due to a change in Administration to one friendlier to (and, coincidentally, heavily supported by) Microsoft, the government stopped seeking breakup as a remedy while the new proceedings were pending, and a far weaker remedy was mutually negotiated as a settlement.

Re:FCC to move ahead with 'rulemaking' on Section 230 by Meph504 on Saturday October 17, 2020 @05:45PM (#24813651)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Cor...

"The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned Judge Jackson's rulings against Microsoft. This was partly because the appellate court had adopted a "drastically altered scope of liability" under which the remedies could be taken, and also partly due to the embargoed interviews Judge Jackson had given to the news media while he was still hearing the case, in violation of the Code of Conduct for US Judges.[24] Judge Jackson did not attend the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals hearing, in which the appeals court judges accused him of unethical conduct and determined he should have recused himself from the case"