Re:We Tested Comma AI's OpenPilot
by DoingIsLearning on Friday October 16, 2020 @07:43AM
(#24799793)
Thanks jmiskovic, I stand corrected:
> openpilot is developed in good faith to be compliant with FMVSS requirements and to follow industry standards of safety for Level 2 Driver Assistance Systems. In particular, we observe ISO26262 guidelines, including those from pertinent documents released by NHTSA. In addition, we impose strict coding guidelines (like MISRA C : 2012) on parts of openpilot that are safety relevant. We also perform software-in-the-loop, hardware-in-the-loop and in-vehicle tests before each software release. [0]
I would be quite curious to see how they perform HIL tests and in-vehicle tests and if those results are also public?
> openpilot is developed in good faith to be compliant with FMVSS requirements and to follow industry standards of safety for Level 2 Driver Assistance Systems. In particular, we observe ISO26262 guidelines, including those from pertinent documents released by NHTSA. In addition, we impose strict coding guidelines (like MISRA C : 2012) on parts of openpilot that are safety relevant. We also perform software-in-the-loop, hardware-in-the-loop and in-vehicle tests before each software release. [0]
I would be quite curious to see how they perform HIL tests and in-vehicle tests and if those results are also public?
[0] https://github.com/commaai/openpilot/blob/master/SAFETY.md
Edit: I cannot edit or remove the grandparent comment but I leave here this correction