Re:Twitter and Facebook's action over Joe Biden article reig...
by Karunamon on Friday October 16, 2020 @04:56PM
(#24804981)
So you see no problem whatsoever with large, nigh-monopolistic interests having absolute authority over how politics is discussed?
This is not a strawman, I simply see no other way to interpret this comment.
Re:Twitter and Facebook's action over Joe Biden article reig...
by manigandham on Friday October 16, 2020 @02:20AM
(#24798060)
Social media are specifically not publishers, so no they're not "just like" the NYT/Fox.
They don't create content as an organization and only facilitate communication, which is exactly why section 230 is being contested.
Re:Twitter and Facebook's action over Joe Biden article reig...
by snowwrestler on Friday October 16, 2020 @03:13AM
(#24798378)
Section 230 applies equally to any interactive computer service, whether it is operated by Twitter, Facebook, NY Times, Fox, Ycombinator, or even you or me.
The First Amendment applies to everyone in the U.S.
Re:Twitter and Facebook's action over Joe Biden article reig...
by manigandham on Friday October 16, 2020 @03:29PM
(#24804150)
Yes, and since social networks are only third-party content, they should not be interfering with it otherwise they are exercising editorial control and are now first-party content.
News organizations have wielded this power for at least a century. Their decisions on what stories to publish obviously have political implications, and in some cases their editorial boards even explicitly endorse one candidate.
Facebook and Twitter are private entities, just like The NY Times or Fox News.