Twitter and Facebook's action over Joe Biden article reignites bias claims

Re:Twitter and Facebook's action over Joe Biden article reig... by slg on Friday October 16, 2020 @01:03AM (#24797660)

There is a difference between physical ownership of property and ownership of information. Imagine there is a book in that abandoned storage space. The operator will gain ownership of that copy of the book, but they aren't going to be granted copyright over the book.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter and Facebook's action over Joe Biden article reig... by chithanh on Friday October 16, 2020 @01:13AM (#24797704)

But now that you have legal access to the book, you can publish citations from it under fair-use doctrine.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter and Facebook's action over Joe Biden article reig... by slg on Friday October 16, 2020 @01:29AM (#24797787)

Sure, but fair use is a defense that needs to be argued. You can probably argue that the New York Post publishing excerpts from some of the emails should be protected by fair use. I don't see how you can argue that the store owner is protected by fair use or how the Post releasing and profiting off previously unpublished full photos of Hunter Biden qualify as fair use.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter and Facebook's action over Joe Biden article reig... by chithanh on Friday October 16, 2020 @03:40AM (#24798543)

If it is not covered by fair use, then it would be at most copyright infringement, and there the rights holders can use DMCA takedown notices. There was no necessity of Twitter to engage in pro-active censorship here.

In my understanding the policy was aimed originally at stopping the spread of photos like in The Fappening hack. But there was nothing hacked here in my understanding.

[ Parent | on HN ]