Re:YouTube bans coronavirus vaccine misinformation
by exolymph on Thursday October 15, 2020 @06:36PM
(#24795060)
Yes, because you don't know what you don't know, and you won't find out if you don't allow dissent.
Re:YouTube bans coronavirus vaccine misinformation
by shawnz on Thursday October 15, 2020 @06:38PM
(#24795090)
"Almost free speech" doesn't necessarily mean dissent isn't allowed
Re:YouTube bans coronavirus vaccine misinformation
by RikNieu on Friday October 16, 2020 @04:53AM
(#24798925)
Almost. Who decides what "almost" is?
Re:YouTube bans coronavirus vaccine misinformation
by shawnz on Friday October 16, 2020 @08:24AM
(#24800090)
Hopefully the electorate.
Re:YouTube bans coronavirus vaccine misinformation
by exolymph on Friday October 16, 2020 @02:38PM
(#24803704)
"Dissent as long as a centralized authority permits it" doesn't sound great to me!
Re:YouTube bans coronavirus vaccine misinformation
by shawnz on Friday October 16, 2020 @05:45PM
(#24805355)
How is that different from "free speech as long as a centralized authority permits it" like you have now, besides being more specific?
Re:YouTube bans coronavirus vaccine misinformation
by raxxorrax on Friday October 16, 2020 @01:17AM
(#24797726)
Almost free speech isn't acceptable.
Re:YouTube bans coronavirus vaccine misinformation
by shawnz on Friday October 16, 2020 @08:27AM
(#24800114)
That is the question being discussed in the thread where you are replying.
Re:YouTube bans coronavirus vaccine misinformation
by walterbell on Thursday October 15, 2020 @11:44AM
(#24789798)
If existing reality seems to "work", is it so bad to exclude non-establishment innovations, while the larger world/markets continue to compete and innovate?
If the establishment's views are strongly codified and checks and balances are in place to maintain them, is that so bad?