News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MusicNet (2016) by Uberphallus on Thursday October 15, 2020 @08:37AM (#24787931)
For those interested, there's a piano-centered dataset[0]

[0]https://magenta.tensorflow.org/datasets/maestro

Re:MusicNet (2016) by dpflan on Thursday October 15, 2020 @08:48AM (#24788023)
Somewhat silly question: To what extent does analysis of music/sound by looking at spectrogram images provide "enough" information for usage in deep learning systems (like ResNet) compared to something like MusicNet?
Re:MusicNet (2016) by dijksterhuis on Thursday October 15, 2020 @11:24AM (#24789551)
They're pretty fundamental. speech to text networks like DeepSpeech convert audio to an MFCC power spectrogram. Others use an Stft magnitude spectrogram.

It's a 2-d (amplitude by Freq and time) representation of something that's usually 1-d (amplitude over time).

I think some networks have tried using the discrete wavelet transform too,but that's outside my knowledge area.

Re:MusicNet (2016) by dpflan on Thursday October 15, 2020 @11:46AM (#24789822)
Thanks for the explanation. I've checked out your HN profile and then SoundCloud: are many of the tracks you've posted generating as part of your research into "adversarial audio examples"?
Re:MusicNet (2016) by dijksterhuis on Tuesday October 20, 2020 @03:47PM (#24841630)
Sorry, I just saw this.

Ha, noooo. I own a bunch of synths and samplers and noodle about for fun.

Although I haven't played with them much recently. I've gotten all super serious @_@

People do have to host their adversarial examples somewhere when publishing their research, not sure why no one has used SoundCloud yet... Odd.

Re:MusicNet (2016) by psychometry on Thursday October 15, 2020 @10:07AM (#24788792)
I love those videos on Youtube that follow along with scores. I'm sure many of them are copyright violations, though...