News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon’s $23,698,655.93 book about flies by regularfry on Saturday April 23, 2011 @03:41AM (#2476451)
Not really. But it can be how futures work.
Re:Amazon’s $23,698,655.93 book about flies by coolgeek on Saturday April 23, 2011 @03:21PM (#2477340)
It is in fact how naked puts work

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_put

Re:Amazon’s $23,698,655.93 book about flies by eru on Saturday April 23, 2011 @03:58PM (#2477439)
Aren't you talking about naked calls (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_call)?
Re:Amazon’s $23,698,655.93 book about flies by coolgeek on Saturday April 23, 2011 @09:40PM (#2478074)
Them too. Both involve "selling something you don't own" (the underlying security), a point disputed in the post I was replying to.
Re:Amazon’s $23,698,655.93 book about flies by eru on Monday April 25, 2011 @04:58AM (#2480822)
I don't see how writing naked puts involves selling. They involve buying, only.
Re:Amazon’s $23,698,655.93 book about flies by Snurre on Tuesday April 26, 2011 @05:58PM (#2487393)
All buying involve the counterpart selling. How can you buy something that isn't sold?
Re:Amazon’s $23,698,655.93 book about flies by eru on Tuesday April 26, 2011 @06:23PM (#2487463)
Oh, but in naked puts the seller of the underlying assets (i.e. the buyer of the put) calls the shots. If they don't want to sell, they don't have to sell. And the writer of the put only ever has to put up at most the strike price of the put.

So no unlimited risks there.