News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Serverless Revolution Has Stalled by t0astbread on Tuesday October 13, 2020 @12:01AM (#24762150)
A middle ground between both would be ideal. Does AWS offer settings to cap your spendings? (I googled and found AWS Budgets but it seems to be only an alerting system, not a cap.)
Re:The Serverless Revolution Has Stalled by nurettin on Tuesday October 13, 2020 @12:38AM (#24762329)
AFAIK at the moment there is no cap. It's pretty much like going long on a crashing market. However, you can later have a bunch of emails and tweets basically begging to be reimbursed and it works most of the time.
Re:The Serverless Revolution Has Stalled by vanviegen on Tuesday October 13, 2020 @01:26AM (#24762538)
Going long will limit your losses to the amount invested. The point is that your AWS bill has no such limit whatsoever.
Re:The Serverless Revolution Has Stalled by SiVal on Tuesday October 13, 2020 @03:21AM (#24763111)
Yes, going with AWS is a short. You're shorting your own popularity. If your popularity explodes upward, there is no cap on your losses to AWS. The theory is that you are also hedged by your business so the limitless losses to AWS are more than compensated for by even larger gains in your business. But if you're caught with an unhedged short....yikes.
Re:The Serverless Revolution Has Stalled by thaeli on Tuesday October 13, 2020 @12:53PM (#24767369)
The recommended solution is, ironically for this topic, to have your billing alerts trigger Lambda functions you've written to shut down your infrastructure.