Edit: Also looking at the data people spent more time on the problem in the private setting than the public. Their stats could therefore be as simple as the students not caring about the result and therefore they quit earlier in the more uncomfortable environment instead of doing it properly and checking their solution. This wouldn't be a thing in real interviews since there a lot is at stake so people wouldn't quit early, at least in my experience not a single candidate I've interviewed quit early.
Edit Edit: For example, their very impressive "All women in private completed it, all women in public failed" stat can also be described as "Women in private spent on average 16 minutes on the problem, women in public spent on average 7 minutes on the problem". Maybe if they had more at stake and therefore more stress they would have spent the entire 30 minutes and therefore done just as well?
Anyway, my point is that just because the abstract says they have clear evidence that stress is hurting performance these studies are still mostly garbage. Don't take it as proof just because there is a study.
I don't. I take my lived experience as proof that this is real.
You seem to be in denial of a common psychological experience.
I'm just going to link again to a scientific study on the subject.
https://news.ncsu.edu/2020/07/tech-job-interviews-anxiety/