News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Memory safe ‘curl’ for a more secure internet by k__ on Friday October 09, 2020 @11:01AM (#24730525)
"It has always been that way." doesn't seem to be a helpful statement here.
Re:Memory safe ‘curl’ for a more secure internet by steveklabnik on Friday October 09, 2020 @11:08AM (#24730585)
I mean, in some sense you're right, but in another, the point is that it's not a regression.
Re:Memory safe ‘curl’ for a more secure internet by k__ on Friday October 09, 2020 @11:10AM (#24730606)
True.

Also, I coud imagine Rust's type-system raises the bar of dependencies that can be mangaged before everything breaks down. So a lib with 100 deps in NPM isn't the same as a lib with 100 deps in Cargo.

Re:Memory safe ‘curl’ for a more secure internet by tracker1 on Friday October 09, 2020 @11:57PM (#24736595)
If you lock to specific versions, I don't think it differs much.

Edit: I mean if you don't use ~ or ^ in your nose dependencies,. Just explicit versions.

Re:Memory safe ‘curl’ for a more secure internet by stjohnswarts on Saturday October 10, 2020 @04:07PM (#24741496)
Yes but people often throw out empty criticism without offering solutions or alternatives and it gets annoying after a while and is just a complaint rather than a healthy critique. As programmers we've heard them all before I guarantee it, so why add another one to the pile?