News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why the Arabic world turned away from science (2011) by nradov on Friday October 09, 2020 @09:47AM (#24729849)
That is not scientifically accurate. A significant fraction of influenza cases are also asymptomatic, and they are capable of spreading the disease to others.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4586318/

You could have already killed someone without even knowing it by transmitting the flu to them. There's no way to know for sure.

US federal and state handling of the pandemic has been mostly terrible. But even if we had competent, honest leaders I doubt the long-term death toll would be much different. Community transmission was already widespread by the time anyone realized there was a serious problem, and by that point it was too late to contain the pandemic.

https://www.wsj.com/graphics/when-did-covid-hit-earliest-dea...

Re:Why the Arabic world turned away from science (2011) by reincarnate0x14 on Friday October 09, 2020 @10:09AM (#24730037)
Funny how places like Taiwan reacted far earlier and have near zero fatalities then.

I sometime forget to not bother commenting on overly politicized things on HN. Your own links show 20% potential asymptomatic influenza infections, which is only a tiny bit different from the estimated 80-95% on SARS-COV-2.

Downvote away though.

Re:Why the Arabic world turned away from science (2011) by nradov on Friday October 09, 2020 @12:27PM (#24731519)
That is not scientifically accurate. During the USS Theodore Roosevelt outbreak only 19% of cases were asymptomatic. Those sailors were generally younger and healthier than the general population so if anything we would expect the overall rate of asymptomatic cases to be lower.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7315794/

So where are you coming up with that 80-95% number?