Re:Google’s Supreme Court faceoff with Oracle was a disaster...
by phire on Friday October 09, 2020 @12:27AM
(#24726825)
Are google deliberately not arguing the "APIs should be patentable but not copyrightable" angle because they think that would make the situation even worse than it already is?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google’s Supreme Court faceoff with Oracle was a disaster...
by imtringued on Friday October 09, 2020 @05:33AM
(#24728238)
Patents are opt in while copyright is opt out. If APIs are copyrightable Google will never get access to the Java API, ever. If someone gets a patent then it will expire eventually. Of course Google wants to go back to the status quo: APIs not being protected by IP rights.
Re:Google’s Supreme Court faceoff with Oracle was a disaster...
by int_19h on Saturday October 10, 2020 @06:32PM
(#24742361)
Is this actually the status quo? There are patents on APIs around, and since they were granted, it would seem that USPO, at least, doesn't think that APIs are inherently unpatentable.