News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Google’s Supreme Court faceoff with Oracle was a disaster for Google. Parent comment

Re:Google’s Supreme Court faceoff with Oracle was a disaster... by nitrogen on Thursday October 08, 2020 @10:16PM (#24726065)
Then, the question is whether these choices of where to put the parameter reflect any creativity.

Though the choices are creative, it's necessary to replicate them exactly to produce a functioning interface for existing Java code. It's like a design for an electrical connector; maybe patentable, but it's essential to the function so shouldn't be copyrightable.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s Supreme Court faceoff with Oracle was a disaster... by phire on Friday October 09, 2020 @12:27AM (#24726825)
Are google deliberately not arguing the "APIs should be patentable but not copyrightable" angle because they think that would make the situation even worse than it already is?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s Supreme Court faceoff with Oracle was a disaster... by imtringued on Friday October 09, 2020 @05:33AM (#24728238)
Patents are opt in while copyright is opt out. If APIs are copyrightable Google will never get access to the Java API, ever. If someone gets a patent then it will expire eventually. Of course Google wants to go back to the status quo: APIs not being protected by IP rights.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google’s Supreme Court faceoff with Oracle was a disaster... by int_19h on Saturday October 10, 2020 @06:32PM (#24742361)
Is this actually the status quo? There are patents on APIs around, and since they were granted, it would seem that USPO, at least, doesn't think that APIs are inherently unpatentable.
[ Parent | on HN ]