The students who get bumped up to a better school (and graduate) end up getting better paying jobs, but it must cause a lot of people to form negative stereotypes along the way.
Maybe a better solution would be to provide extra help to disadvantaged groups before students are academically segregated.
Yes, the better approach is to help this kids as early as possible. However the problem is that kids are academically segregated from the very start by the quality of their school district. I am all for fixing that.
I might be more willing to believe this academic segregation is a genuine concern from this administration if they actually made any effort at improving these poor districts instead of seemingly ignoring the problem and giving parents the choice to simply abandon these school districts.
"Admitting people into college when they do not have the academic merit to be accepted harms them because they end up failing out of their class, even if they could have been wildly successful at a less rigorous university."
Perhaps they're referring to this line of argument?
I'll try to find the source, from one of his books.
>We estimate that over three quarters of the students who apply for admission to Yale are qualified to do the work here. The great majority of students who are admitted stand out from the rest because a lot of little things, when added up, tip the scale in their favor.
Their applicant pool is so deep that they have their pick of qualified students of every type. They aren't admitting people who can't do the work just to meet some quota.
But let's say your theory is true and that the lower ranks of Yale's graduating classes are full of Black students, why is that a problem? Is getting bad grades at Yale going to damage your life? Are people graduating low in their class from elite universities worse off than people graduating higher in their class from worst universities? Plenty of successful people weren't highly ranked in their graduating class. Getting bad grades at an elite university like Yale seems to almost be a requirement to run for president nowadays. And regardless of the admission policies, some people have to end up being the worst ranked in their graduating class. Why does it matter if it is a Black students or anyone else?
Would I personally pick worst in class at a top uni over middle or best a level lower? Eh, probably.
Either way, it's really not my theory. It's something Thomas Sowell documented in one of his books. Here he is talking about it: "Thomas Sowell: affirmative action creates academic failure & resentment" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVvnTByzTmA.
Sowell is black, if it matters. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sowell.
It is perpetuating the racial stereotype of black people as stupid and likely creates strong unconscious bias in everyone at that college that black people are dumber, since among the students accepted to the school the black students will have the worst track record. It doesn't hurt the black people individually, but it hurts black people as a group. I wouldn't be surprised if we include the group effect that even the individuals are hurt more than helped long term.
I don't know the merits of this case, but I know the second paragraph in this release is a load of BS. The Justice Department is claiming that those African Americans accepted into Yale are actually hurt by being accepted because their acceptance is reinforcing stereotypes that they needed extra assistance to get accepted. This is just the same conservative talking point that we have heard for generations that you can't do anything to help anyone because any assistance just makes them weaker.