News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We Hacked Apple for 3 Months by Spooky23 on Thursday October 08, 2020 @10:04AM (#24719171)
Apple paid with public exposure. Anything Apple is a story of interest, which has a value especially in security circles where half the business is a pure PR exercise.

I’ve spent time in my career with a “big gorilla” employer whose business is very visible within its community. Companies will “pay” a lot to say “We solved FooCorp’s problems with <x>” or “FooCorp bought our <y>”

Lazy buyers assume that their peers have their shit together.

Re:We Hacked Apple for 3 Months by Cthulhu_ on Thursday October 08, 2020 @10:19AM (#24719273)
While it's a great marketing and reputation building tool, it's still pretty poor to pay people in exposure; they could have taken each and every one of these exploits to the black market instead and they probably would have earned a lot more money.
Re:We Hacked Apple for 3 Months by derefr on Thursday October 08, 2020 @10:38AM (#24719443)
Alternatively, the Apriso exploit alone apparently would have allowed them to create fake manufacturing-level employees with fake payroll going to arbitrary bank-account targets; so an unethical attacker probably could have collected an unbounded amount of money just from that (since it likely wouldn’t have been caught until after the first event; and payroll would happen all at once, paying out to as many different accounts as the attacker wished.)
Re:We Hacked Apple for 3 Months by Spooky23 on Thursday October 08, 2020 @06:20PM (#24724541)
Your assuming the security professionals in question have a desire to commit a felony.
Re:We Hacked Apple for 3 Months by engineer_22 on Thursday October 08, 2020 @11:22AM (#24719944)
PR is good but it wont keep the lights on. If you want them to return to work for you, pay them with exchange currency. Apple's motive should be to encourage skilled hackers to come forward with exploits - i.e. make it worth their time. Not drive them into the arms of a competitor.