News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: I built a Rotten Tomatoes-style platform for dur... by throwaway0a5e on Wednesday October 07, 2020 @01:05PM (#24710281)
How is your platform going to weed out the people who spent big bucks on some upper middle class targeted products and then double down, reality be damned, on their sunk cost saying it's the best stuff ever?

That seems to be the fate that has befallen the various other "quality products" forums, subreddits, etc.

Re:Show HN: I built a Rotten Tomatoes-style platform for dur... by canada_dry on Wednesday October 07, 2020 @01:59PM (#24710862)
On review/discussion sites I find it very useful to know how new an account is, how many posts they've made, and a score (up/down votes) on their previous posts.
Re:Show HN: I built a Rotten Tomatoes-style platform for dur... by hubraumhugo on Wednesday October 07, 2020 @02:01PM (#24710883)
I introduced a credibility system for every user, similar to Reddit's karma so people can see how trustworthy the user is in the Buy For Life community. I could also imagine picking reviewers by interviewing them initially - someone who owns and uses the product for a while.
Re:Show HN: I built a Rotten Tomatoes-style platform for dur... by kexx on Thursday October 08, 2020 @10:21AM (#24719286)
That's not really enough. Any kind of credibility system can be hacked. You should ask two images, mandatory, and one of them should be 'my product', like a some kind of an actual clue, that the reviewer purchased it at least. If you add some basic checking, like a reverse image search on your own db and in the internet to vet out low effort tries, this would be the minimum to prevent hijacking the system.

I had somewhat similar idea for a site like this, but only for negative reviews. This kind of a site stops the incentive of forging fake review, like who wants to forge a bad one, but this still has to be protected from defamation attempts. That's why I was thinking of making the post somewhat complicated, but not impossible to make the system enough hard to protect it low efforts, which is at least 90% of the attempts, and the rest would be up for a moderation team. The credibility system could work only over protection