News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:For years, Intel sat on its CPU monopoly and now the tide... by _ph_ on Sunday October 04, 2020 @06:48AM (#24677916)
Of course it works. Otherwise there would be no ARM on the servers. But it is second class to a setup, where the development and deployment happens on the same platform. Having good ARM machines available on the desktop will give ARM on the server a boost. As I wrote, don't take my word for it, listen to what Linus hat to say on that topic.
Re:For years, Intel sat on its CPU monopoly and now the tide... by pjmlp on Sunday October 04, 2020 @07:00AM (#24677982)
Ironically UNIX is exactly one kind of platform where remote development is first class.

One just needs to properly configure mount points and remote sessions.

There was hardly any difference between my X sessions and local development.

Re:For years, Intel sat on its CPU monopoly and now the tide... by _ph_ on Sunday October 04, 2020 @09:16AM (#24678812)
Sorry, in general that is not true. You need a very good network connection, both with bandwidth and latency, to make remote devlopment workable. Still, it never equals local development. If you follow the discussions here on hacker news, which terminal software has the smalles latency, remote development never can compete with that.
Re:For years, Intel sat on its CPU monopoly and now the tide... by pjmlp on Sunday October 04, 2020 @09:27AM (#24678874)
Apparently having UNIX servers on premises is a forgotten art.
Re:For years, Intel sat on its CPU monopoly and now the tide... by _ph_ on Sunday October 04, 2020 @10:51AM (#24679452)
It is. Even if companies have their own hardware, it is often in separate compute centers. And of course anything on AWS or Azure is not on premise.
Re:For years, Intel sat on its CPU monopoly and now the tide... by pjmlp on Sunday October 04, 2020 @11:10AM (#24679590)
Not everyone is FAANG, or pretends to be one.