Re:For years, Intel sat on its CPU monopoly and now the tide...
by wmf on Saturday October 03, 2020 @04:01PM
(#24674302)
Eh, every chip company has lower-end models that are cheaper. There's nothing stopping Apple from putting i3s in Macs.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:For years, Intel sat on its CPU monopoly and now the tide...
by bobbylarrybobby on Saturday October 03, 2020 @05:55PM
(#24674972)
The point is that apple's models would not be lower end, just cheaper.
Re:For years, Intel sat on its CPU monopoly and now the tide...
by mulmen on Saturday October 03, 2020 @05:23PM
(#24674768)
But what if Apple offers a Macbook with i7 performance and i3 price?
Re:For years, Intel sat on its CPU monopoly and now the tide...
by The_Colonel on Saturday October 03, 2020 @05:56PM
(#24674983)
Typical Apple - undercutting other companies on price \s
Re:For years, Intel sat on its CPU monopoly and now the tide...
by thekyle on Saturday October 03, 2020 @06:47PM
(#24675240)
I know you're joking, but looking at some Geekbench scores there doesn't seem to be a single Android phone on the market that can outperform the iPhone SE in single-core performance. The OnePlus 8 is the closest, but still not really that close.
iPhone SE: 1321
OnePlus 8: 898
On multi-core it's a little better since there seem to be seven Android phones that can outperform the iPhone SE:
iPhone SE: 2737
OnePlus 8: 3281
OnePlus 8 Pro: 3216
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G: 3107
Samsung Galaxy S20+ 5G: 3102
Samsung Galaxy S20 5G: 3078
Huawei Mate 30 Pro 5G: 2918
Huawei Mate 30 Pro: 2835
However, all of those Android phones cost quite a bit more than the SE.
Re:For years, Intel sat on its CPU monopoly and now the tide...
by srndpty on Monday October 05, 2020 @12:40PM
(#24689349)
They do in the mac mini.
Re:For years, Intel sat on its CPU monopoly and now the tide...
by solarkraft on Saturday October 03, 2020 @04:23PM
(#24674431)
With low-end branding and possibly sub-par performance.